USMC Tank Battalion Reduced as Charlie Company Deactivated

 

Marines from the Camp Lejeune-based 2nd Tank Battalion and 2nd Combat Engineer Battalion, 2nd Marine Division conduct armored breaching operations Mar. 17, 2015, at Fort Pickett, Va. Engineers supported A Co., 2nd Tank Battalion by firing an inert M58 Mine Clearing Line Charge, or MICLIC, from an M1 Assault Breaching Vehicle, while a platoon of M1A1 Abrams main battle tank maneuvered around several obstacles. Marines are training at Fort Pickett as part of a five-week Deployment For Training exercise, which tests the Marines ability to move a massive amount of personnel and equipment, while sustaining simulated combat operations. The exercise incorporates every combat requirement that the Marines are expected to perform during combat operations, to include: platoon and company-level maneuvers, targeting, individual and collective gunnery, logistics operations, convoy movements, and tank and infantry integration. (Photo by Capt. Andrew J. Czaplicki, Virginia Guard Public Affairs)

TDM looks at the strength of Marine Corps 2nd Tank Battalion as a key company is terminated By Josh Cohen

As the second phase in a planned force structure drawdown looms, Marine Corps 2nd Tank Battalion armor strength will be significantly reduced as another of its line units cases its colors. On March 4th, 2016, Charlie Company will be deactivated during a formal ceremony at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina. Lieutenant Colonel Robert Bodisch, 2nd Tank Battalion’s Commanding Officer provided an update on the impending main battle tank reductions.

“Since we will only have two tank companies, we will need augmentation either from the reserves (tank companies from 4th Tank Battalion) or internally within the 2nd Marine Division with attached mechanized infantry companies to operate as a maneuver battalion.  We won’t be able to operate as in the past and the largest impact will be on 2nd Marine Division infantry,” Bodisch explained. “Our ability to task organize as mechanized and armor company teams for our infantry regiments will be greatly limited, as well as our ability to form task organized mechanized and armor battalion-sized task forces for the division,” he added.

Once Charlie Company is deactivated, 2nd Tank Battalion will be comprised of 30 operational M1A1 tanks equipping the unit’s remaining A and B companies. Supporting the east coast Marine Expeditionary Units, Black Sea Rotational Force and US-based ITX exercises will significantly impact our ability to support other contingencies and division-level training at Camp Lejeune, Bodisch said.

“There will be an impact on training at both the higher and lower echelons, and the reduction here at 2nd Tanks could degrade 1st Tank Battalion’s company-level training opportunities as we may have to rely on them for increased support for our ITX exercises, as we may only be able to send a company headquarters and one tank platoon, before the cuts we sent a full tank company (company headquarters and three tank platoons), that has to be filled out somehow,” Bodisch explained the two battalions will come up with an agreement to minimize the impact of the overall force structure reductions.”

Also concerned with the loss of 2nd Tank Battalion’s ability to fully integrate with a Marine Air Ground Task Force, Bodisch sees a mismatch in table of organization between 1st and 2nd Tank Battalions. Right now we see don’t see all the implications of non-mirrored Marine Corps tank battalions, we’re going to learn things we can’t foresee, particularly second and third order effects over time.”

“Charlie Company has the richest history of all USMC tank formations, it was the first company to see combat in World War II, and since has participated in every battalion-level combat deployment of 2nd Tank Battalion, we’ve invited as many former Charlie Company commanders and alumni we could locate, the deactivation ceremony is generating substantial interest,” Bodisch noted.

Looking toward a much-reduced 2nd Tank Battalion, Bodisch pondered, “what will be the future for mechanized armor in the Marine Corps, I am not sure anyone is asking that question.”

 

Also, be sure to check out the piece on Delta’s Company’s deactivation!

 

 Photo by Lt. Col. Robert Bodisch, USMC